US Army Corps of Engineers Attorney’s Response to Tribal Brief Is Insulting

The attorney representing the US Army Corps of Engineers practically insulted the Standing Rock Sioux in his response to the brief they filed a US Circuit Court.

Tribes ask court to shut down Dakota Access pipeline | TheHill

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/345709-tribes-ask-court-to-shut-down-dakota-access-pipeline

US Army Corps of Engineers Attorney’s Response to Tribal Brief Is Insulting

The attorney representing the US Army Corps of Engineers practically insulted the Standing Rock Sioux in his response to the brief they filed the US Circuit Court. On Monday, The Standing Rock Sioux and Cheyenne River tribes filed a brief requesting that the Dakota Access Pipeline be shut down until the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers finished a further environmental review, as ordered by US Circuit Court Judge James Boasberg.

Earlier this year, Judge Boasberg ruled that an environmental impact review by the US Army Corps of Engineers was insufficient because it failed to take into account the effect the pipeline would have on tribal fishing and hunting rights. He ordered the US Army Corps of Engineers to do a complete environmental impact review, saying that a shutdown of the pipeline was an option that he would consider if the Corps of Engineers did not follow his ruling. This was viewed as a small victory for the tribal leaders. Even though a shutdown of the Dakota Access Pipeline didn’t happen, the judge’s statement that the show that he meant business and that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should take him seriously.

The insult by the Corp’s attorney came with his response to the tribal brief when he said, ordering a shutdown “would be inconsistent with the circuit precedent and would result in undue hardship and additional risks and concerns for the federal government, the pipeline owner, and the public.”

As a member of the public, I greatly resent this ambulance chaser using my name as a method to put off this tribe that the brief, which I am in total support. How dare he used the name of the “public” to somehow justify the US Army Corps of Engineers blatant abuse of the Standing Rock Sioux?

Also, the part about how a shutdown would create “undue hardship” to the owners of the pipeline is also total bullshit. Notice how he neglects to mention the hardship that will because if the pipeline were to leak a large quantity of oil into the Standing Rock Sioux’s water supply, causing irreparable damage to it. Also, what about the hardship this would create for those of us who share this environment?

Once again a corporation tries to give itself the same rights as a citizen; something which is complete bullshit because corporations are not citizens, despite the asinine ruling of the US Supreme Court.

 

A Small Victory for Activists Against the Dakota Access Pipeline

“It’s the first glimmer of hope, of good news, that we’ve had out here for weeks—months.” Source: Activists say Dakota Access Pipeline could be put on hold for 30 days A Small Victory for Activists Against the Dakota Access Pipeline Activists who oppose the Dakota Access Pipeline, in North Dakota, have won a …
Judge Gives Favorable Ruling Against The Dakota Access Pipeline

A judge’s ruling that might open the door for at least a temporary shutdown of the disputed Dakota Access pipeline surprised the industry that hailed the project as a “game changer” for North Dakota oil. Source: Ruling on Dakota Access pipeline surprises oil industry Judge Gives Favorable Ruling Against The Dakota Access …

 

More Lobbyists To Be Involved with Dakota Access Pipeline Decision

Judge James Boasberg said he might also allow other national energy and manufacturing groups to weigh in on the final decision about the Dakota Access Pipeline.

State trade group can weigh in on Dakota Access pipeline | The Sacramento Bee

More Lobbyists To Be Involved with Dakota Access Pipeline Decision

Judge James Boasberg said he might also allow other national energy and manufacturing groups to weigh in on the final decision about the Dakota Access Pipeline. Tribal representatives and attorneys have voiced no objection to this decision. As those of you have followed this controversy involving the Dakota Access Pipeline may know, US District Judge James Boasberg has already ruled that he may stop the flow of oil through the pipeline.

Judge Boasberg has already ruled that the rights of the Standing Rock Sioux nation may not have been properly considered in the decision to go forward with the building of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The tribe says that this pipeline violates their tribal sovereignty by being built across sacred lands, but also threatens the tribe’s water supply. Judge Boasberg is also the judge to refuse to stop the construction of the pipeline in the first place. This entire mess would have been solved at that time if Judge Boasberg would have shown some guts to stand up to the oil industry, especially Energy Transfer Partners.

These latter two points should be a no-brainer for anyone who has followed the controversy surrounding the building of the pipeline. In fact, the wishes of the Standing Rock Sioux nation have been trampled, let alone violated. The pipeline is built across a land that is considered sacred and undoubtedly threatens their water supply because it is built under a lake which supplies the tribe with potable water. This is something that Judge Boasberg should have seen from the beginning. I believe he actually did see this but chose to look the other way as the tribe’s rights were being given no consideration by anyone.

It seems that it is rather late to consider the needs of the Standing Rock Sioux since the Dakota Access Pipeline has already been built and has had oral flowing through it since June 1. Where was Judge Boasberg then when he would have done some good on behalf of the tribe?

If anything, Judge Boasberg should give a ruling that would allow more pro-alternative energy advocates to have a voice in a matter that threatens the ecology of this entire region. It seems like it is a little late to involve anyone after the pipeline has always been built and is in use. This entire thing reminds me of the old saying about closing the barn door after the horses have escaped.

If the US District Court Judge Boasberg makes any type of ruling, it should be for the shutdown of the Dakota Access Pipeline. However, since that will cost these already wealthy oil companies more money, that is very unlikely.

 

Dakota Access Pipeline: What’s at stake? – CNN.com

Oct 28, 2016 It’s a $3.7 billion project that would cross four states and change the landscape of the US crude oil supply.

Dakota Access Pipeline: Threat to Native American Rights

Dakota Access Pipeline: Threat to Native American Rights The Dakota Access Pipeline is the latest threat to Native American sovereignty that has happened in a while.  Unfortunately, the “mainstream media” has failed to give it much attention.  As usual, when they do give out any information about the Dakota Access …

Bassett